Area measurements in square meter Completed

Sebastian Nerz

Hello,

I'd love to have an option to display the size of an area (polygon, area assignment) not in km² but in m² - makes life easier when building area assignments for dogs and fits more with the measurements our local dog teams are used to working with (Germany).

Is this possible?

Thanks :)

0

Comments

8 comments

  • Comment author
    Rachel
    • Official comment

    This is now live on the website, app will follow with next release. 

  • Comment author
    Matt Jacobs

    For our awareness, what are the scales you're usually working at that you would want expressed in square meters?  It sounds like a reasonable request, but it also seems like typical search assignments in my area (0.25 - 0.5 square kilometers) would be translate to very large numbers of square meters.

    0
  • Comment author
    Sebastian Nerz

    Thanks for the feedback!

    For dog area searches in forests, a single dog can searches roughly 25.000-30.000m². So the area sizes will vary between 25k and 300k m².
    Alternative to square meters would be a (100m²) or ha (10.000m²), whatever would be easiest.

    0
  • Comment author
    Sebastian Nerz

    Thanks, that's an awesomely fast change!

    Looks like till 10.000m² the area is shown in square meters and above that in square kilometres, is that correct?

    0
  • Comment author
    Marc Chauvin

    Yes that is correct

    0
  • Comment author
    Sebastian Nerz

    Thanks!

    But what I was mostly looking to was to get a higher precision when handling i.e. 25.000 square meters or 50.000 or similar, so smaller areas with 1-4 dogs (25-100k sqm). With the square km display, precision is down to 10ksqm - so the assigned area could be 20 or 30k sqm (or, if its rounded, it could be i.e. 25k-34999sqm).

    Of course, this can be mitigated, but when i.e. searching for suicidal persons with small initial searching areas and branching out, having it displayed as sqm, ar or ha would save time. It would absolutely be fine to have this as an option (i.e. "metric" / "metric small areas" or similar).

    1
  • Comment author
    Marc Chauvin
    • Edited

    We have made some changes that I believe will solve your issue. We use m² from 0-9999 m² then hectares from 1 to 249.9 ha then km² from 2.50 km² and greater.

    0
  • Comment author
    Sebastian Nerz

    Awesome thanks

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.