MVUM for Montana

Bob Miller's Avatar

Bob Miller

15 May, 2020 08:05 PM

It seems like the MVUM data for Montana is nearly missing (just tiny sections of trail/roads show up when I turn the layer on). Is there a reason for this or am I doing something wrong? Other states, Idaho for example, appear to have complete MVUM data.

Thanks in advance for your help.

  1. Support Staff 1 Posted by rmarcucci on 16 May, 2020 12:51 AM

    rmarcucci's Avatar

    Hi Bob,

    This wasn't a clean, easy layer for us to create, we had to get the underlying data from a lot of different sources. I'm imaging this is a sourcing issue as a result of that process. I'm going to send this off to someone who worked creating this layer, but they are taking a long weekend, so we likely won't get an answer until midweek, FYI.

    Thank you for reaching out,

  2. Support Staff 2 Posted by Ben Lantow on 20 May, 2020 11:28 PM

    Ben Lantow's Avatar

    It likely has to do with the USFS or BLM their data sets are incomplete at best unfortunately and some are actually hidden or restricted which is kinda crazy. However you can import the raw PDF file for your use using our geospatial image function. (Add Layer - Geospatial Image) which may get what you want for the time being.


  3. Ben Lantow closed this discussion on 20 May, 2020 11:28 PM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.

Keyboard shortcuts


? Show this help
ESC Blurs the current field

Comment Form

r Focus the comment reply box
^ + ↩ Submit the comment

You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac